KNOTTINGLEY PUBLIC HOUSES & BREWERIES
circa. 1750 – 1998
by TERRY SPENCER B.A.(Hons), Ph D. (1998)
CHAPTER EIGHT
INDUSTRY AND SOBRIETY
In
1870 Knottingley had an unenviable reputation as an unruly community with
above average rates for illegitimacy and petty crime and also a mortality rate
higher than any of the local townships. (1) Whilst it is not suggested
that local public houses were the sole reason, or even the predominant
reason, for this state of affairs, there is no doubt that the drunkenness
they promoted was an important factor influencing adverse social
conditions within the town.
As
early as 1848, the need for moral uplift was given practical expression by
the decision to divide the existing parish. A new parish was created to
serve the spiritual needs of the expanding community of east Knottingley.
A new church, Christ Church, was erected at Seaton’s Croft as the symbol
of moral and spiritual regeneration and a vicarage was built at Racca
Green to house the first incumbent, Reverend Thomas Davy, who was
appointed to minister the needs of the growing population. (2)
Some
indication that action however overdue, was minimal in its initial effect
may be gained by reference to the resolution of the Select Vestry, dated 7th
April 1852, which noted the drunkenness, vice and immorality prevalent
within the town. (3)
One
wonders what source provided the ‘most respectable testimony’, upon
which the resolution was based; the parish priests perhaps, and also
whether John Carter in his role as Vestry Chairman, considered the
possibility of any correlation between the manufacture and consumption of
beer and the condition explained of?
The
problem of drunkenness and the dissolute conduct and consequences
engendered by that state was, of course, a national one, particularly in
the burgeoning industrial townships of that period. Long unremitting days
of arduous toil, together with inadequate diet, overcrowded, squalid
domestic conditions and low standards of hygiene and public health,
combined to drive workers to drink. Paradoxically, a case may be made for
the virtues of alcoholic drink for at a qualitative level the dubious
nature of the public water supply may have been more detrimental than the
consumption of liquor. As one authority has pointed out the popular hymn
words "My drink is water bright…from the crystal spring." Have
an ironic significance when compared to the domestic supply, which was
usually polluted, especially when drawn from the river Aire. (4) In
addition, the public houses, as centres of social life among the labouring
classes, afforded a measure of relief from the myriad problems which beset
workers in the course of their daily lives. However, the mores of this
underclass were to a great extent, shaped by the social intercourse
engendered by the confines of licensed premises, resulting in drunkenness
and lewd behaviour which outraged the guardians of local society.
The
table below shows the social composition of the manual workers within the
town during the third quarter of the nineteenth century, comprising the
bulk of customers who frequented the inns of the town at the time when the
general agitation against the consumption of intoxicating liquor was
beginning to exert considerable influence at both national and local
level.
|
1861 |
1871 |
1881 |
| Manual Occupation |
No. |
% |
No. |
% |
No. |
% |
| Craftsmen |
275 |
6.3 |
119 |
3.0 |
228 |
4.5 |
| Limeworkers |
95 |
2.3 |
93 |
2.2 |
53 |
1.1 |
| Pottery Workers |
169 |
3.9 |
116 |
2.9 |
157 |
3.1 |
| Glass Workers |
- |
- |
5 |
0.1 |
172 |
3.4 |
| Railwaymen |
53 |
1.2 |
48 |
1.2 |
65 |
1.3 |
| Waterway Workers |
71 |
1.6 |
57 |
1.4 |
70 |
1.4 |
| Mariners & Shipping |
190 |
4.4 |
161 |
4.0 |
149 |
3.0 |
| General Labourers |
57 |
1.3 |
139 |
3.5 |
209 |
4.1 |
| Agricultural Labourers |
121 |
2.8 |
85 |
2.1 |
87 |
1.7 |
| Domestic Servants |
156 |
3.6 |
179 |
4.4 |
187 |
3.7 |
| Brewers & Maltsters |
19 |
0.4 |
14 |
0.3 |
18 |
0.4 |
| Miscellaneous Occupations |
64 |
1.5 |
72 |
1.8 |
123 |
2.4 |
| Victuallers |
62 |
1.4 |
58 |
1.4 |
64 |
1.3 |
| Inn & Boarding House Keepers |
24 |
0.5 |
21 |
0.5 |
25 |
0.5 |
| Local Population |
4,379 |
4,039 |
5,069 |
The
workers categorised above comprised 29% of the local population in 1861
and almost 30% twenty years later. A slight decline to 28% in the middle
decade mirrors a decline in the occupations associated with the
traditional local occupations of agriculture and the maritime trade. By
1881 the decline had been offset by the dramatic rise in the number of
glassworkers and general labourers as new industries such as glass and
chemicals replaced old established occupations. The new industrial
labourers in no way diminished the demand for beer but rather stimulated
the demand, hence the comparative stability in the number of innkeepers
shown in the table. However, all was not as idyllic as the brewers and
innkeepers would have liked.
From
the sixteenth century, the Puritans with a fervour combining the threat of
damnation with the appeal to individual reason, had unsuccessfully
inveighed against ale houses and the evils of drink. By the early
nineteenth century the moral force of Wesleyanism had begun to exert a
growing influence generally and nowhere more than in the township of
Knottingley. It was, however, only the requirement for a disciplined and
settled workforce with regular work habits, arising in consequence of the
Industrial Revolution, which engendered any noticeable abatement in the
degree of drunkenness. As industrialisation per se had little practical
application within the town before the last quarter of the century, all
other measures were merely palliatives. Nevertheless, the advocates of
temperance were at work all through the century, being particularly
associate with the Wesleyan congregation by the 1850s.
The
Temperance Movement as an organised pressure group had been present in
Yorkshire since 1830 with branches at Bradford, York and Leeds at that
date. (6) From that time a new phase of temperance is discernible with the
emphasis on total abstinence and greater militancy. By 1860 the issue was
becoming increasingly politicised as the alienated middle classes not only
regarded pubs and beerhouses as sources of working class disaffection,
encouraging militant trade unionism in the same way that an earlier
generation had accused them of being Chartism, but saw brewers, with their
huge profits and tied properties as the manifestation of monopolistic
capitalism. (7) The attainment of temperance goals by political action
resulted in polarisation of the issue as the advocates of temperance
allied with the more sympathetic Liberals and the alliance of brewers,
publicans and maltsters identified with the Conservatives. (8)
Even
before political division had become manifest at Knottingley the well
liked and widely respected John Carter, a liberal in every sense of the
term, was regarded with reservation by an element of the populace. Nor
were the critics confined to the town’s nonconformist element. At a
Temperance Society soiree held at Pontefract in 1864, one of the speakers
was the Reverend E. Gatley of Knottingley, an acquaintance, if not friend,
of Carter. (9) It should not be assumed, however, that all temperance
advocates were motivated solely by moral or ethical considerations.
Commercialism was a motivating factor since those diverted from alcohol
were more likely to attend work regularly and the wages earned be spent on
consumer goods, thus boosting profit margins. (10) Naturally, such aspects
formed the ‘hidden agenda’ of the temperance movement but there was
sufficient material available for propaganda purposes to enable base
motives to remain obscured. The Pontefract Advertiser which had been
established about 1862, regularly featured cases of drunkenness and
disorder at Knottingley. Sometimes the trouble was ‘imported’ as on
the occasion when the police were called to the Ship Inn around midnight
to find a body of at least forty militiamen, drunk and disorderly, had
taken possession of the premises. Eventually, becoming weary of the
tumult, the soldiers ‘fell in’ and marched in disorder along Aire
Street. Some, armed with cudgels, amused themselves by breaking windows,
others by assaulting innocent passers-by whom they encountered as they
quit the town. (11) The soldiers had been undertaking training at
Pontefract throughout the previous month and it is somewhat ironic that
the previous week the local paper reported favourable comments by the
citizens of the town concerning the soldiers good conduct. (12)
Shortly
after the above incident occurred, the Temperance Society undertook a
series of events to highlight the evils of drink. In August 1865, the Band
of Hope drum and fife band paraded in the district (13) and in December
two lectures were delivered by Mr. Charles Bent at the Wesleyan
Schoolrooms, Knottingley, where so persuasive was the case presented,
based entirely upon the gentleman’s experience, that no less than
thirty-two people were reported to have signed the ‘Pledge’. (14)
Many
organisations of middle class composition supported temperance. The local
lodge of the Order of Rechabites restricted its membership to tee-totallers,
whilst the local trade union leaders also commended temperance to their
members. Alfred Greenwood, General Secretary of the Glass Bottle Makers’
of Yorkshire Trade Society, published ‘A Moderate Drinkers Ready
Reckoner’ in one issue of the Society’s Quarterly Report to bring home
to his members, who were prodigious consumers of alcoholic beverages, the
financial cost of drink, leaving them to calculate the human cost
consequent on their indulgence.
Those
members of the middle class resident in Knottingley who were not adverse
to partaking the occasional drink but whose professional and social status
led them to disdain public houses, established their own club in the town.
The Social Club Company, under the secretaryship of Thomas Speak, was
founded about 1860 in premises at the top of Flag Lane, as the Ropewalk
was called. (15) It is no coincidence that the establishment was more
popularly referred to as the ‘Gentlemens’ Club’, being of exclusive
membership. Speak was the owner – occupier of the premises for many
years (16) but the club continued to function well beyond his lifetime
before finally closing its doors about 1947. (17) It is of passing
interest to note that the establishment of the Knottingley Social Club
anticipated by several years the British Workmans’ Public House Movement
which was established at Leeds in 1867, with the aim of providing
conviviality without inebriation, thereby echoing the sentiments of the
gentlemen of Knottingley.
By
the 1860’s other moderating influences within the local community were
the Salvation Army. Founded by William Booth in 1878, the Army had
established a citadel in Knottingley by 1887. From that start the local
corps carried the fight for temperance into the ‘enemy’ camp, visiting
licensed premises and disseminating propaganda, raising finds and making
working class converts by an admix of fervour and goodwill.
A
further moderating influence was the gradual improvements at home, and at
work as the result of continuous legislation from the 1840s, bringing
higher standards of public health and education. By the 1860s the
cumulative effect had produced some amelioration of the conditions, which
were responsible for causing former generations to seek solace in drink.
(18)
By
the 1880s the introduction of cheap public transport facilitated
excursions to the coast and attendance at the increasingly regularised
sporting and social events, all of which provided counter attractions to
public houses.
From
1870 proposals appeared to cut the number of public houses by licence
limitation, increased licence duties and restrictions on opening hours.
Such measures formed part of the Intoxicating Liquors Bill of 1872 but,
ironically, the proposals failed to gain the support of the Temperance
Movement which considered them to be insufficiently restrictive, or the
Church Authorities, who favoured voluntary restraint as opposed to
compulsory sobriety. (19) As a result, the agitation of the brewers and
allied representatives of the licensed trade, prevented legislative
action.
Nevertheless,
the brewers were fully aware of the need to adopt a more responsible
attitude to the problem of drunkenness as a means of countering the
growing criticism of their opponents. Thus, when William Edward Spence,
landlord of the Ship Inn, not only allowed drunkenness on the premises in
the Autumn of 1875 but was prosecuted for being drunk himself, he was
instantly dismissed by George Carter, despite having been a tenant for
fourteen years. (20) In addition, the closing decades of the nineteenth
century witnessed considerable expenditure on the part of the brewery
company in an attempt to present a more wholesome image and provide a
greater degree of customer comfort in the hope of attracting a more
businessmen and professional people and thereby enhance the beleaguered
reputation of its public houses. (21)
Paradoxically,
the dawn of the new industrial era at Knottingley from the 1870s whilst
theoretically regularising drinking habits by displacing the more casual
nature which characterised the structure of the old established
occupations, did little to assuage the demand for drink. Chief amongst the
newly introduced industries was the manufacture of glass containers. The
hot, arduous nature of the work was such that landlords of inns close to
the glasshouses were guaranteed a regular income from the supply of liquor
consumed by the glassmakers throughout their working hours. The shrewd
John Curtis realised this when he provided financial assistance to enable
the establishment of the first glass furnace in the town on land adjacent
to the Commercial Inn. The landlord of the nearby Lime Keel Inn was
reputed to rise early each working day at the turn of the century in order
to have upward of 100 pints pulled ready for the commencement of the
artisans breakfast break. (22) Doubtless a similar scene applied at the
Red Lion Inn which stood next to the Round House, later known as the Hope
Glassworks, established in 1874. At Burdins (1887) and Jacksons (1893)
where the glassworks were at some distance from the nearest pub, a ‘trammer’
was employed to fetch liquor to the workmen at regular intervals
throughout each shift, and so great was the amount consumed that the ‘trammer’,
who received a halfpenny per pint, earned a living wage from his labour.
The
consumption of beer at the workplace was a custom based practice within
the glass trade and when employers such as William Bagley attempted to
curtail the custom in the name of safety and efficiency, they frequently
risked strike action. In face of the employers opposition to drink at
work, the glass hands fought a rearguard action. A secret hatch in the
perimeter fence ensured a link with the Commercial so that ‘essential’
supplies could be unofficially obtained. It was only when the advent of
automatic machine production combined with the licensing restrictions
impose during the Great War that the anti-drink campaign made headway in
the glass industry. Even then a lingering element remained for the writer
can recall in his boyhood, men visiting the ‘jug & bottle’ at inns
near the glassworks in order to purchase beer for consumption during the
shift breaks, a practise continued well into the 1950s. (23)
In
1870 the Yorkshire Brewers formed a County Society to challenge the
influence of the Temperance Movement. The effect was minimal, however, as
factional self-interest manifested in a reluctance to provide adequate
funding, rendered the Society’s efforts ineffectual. (24) Yet despite
social protest, industrial recession, high taxation and restrictive
legislation, all of which contributed to the curtailment of consumption
and changed drinking habits during the closing decades of the nineteenth
century, the licensed trade had a natural constituency of working men to
ensure the survival of the pub into the twentieth century.
Terry Spencer, 1998
<PREV
| NEXT>
|