KNOTTINGLEY PUBLIC HOUSES & BREWERIES
circa. 1750 – 1998
by TERRY SPENCER B.A.(Hons), Ph D. (1998)
CHAPTER SEVEN
TIED PUBLIC HOUSES
When
John Carter succeeded his father as the head of Gaggs, Carter & Co.,
in 1836, the brewery business entered a phase of considerable expansion. A
significant feature of this expansion was the acquisition of retail
outlets for the firms products.
Some
public houses were obtained through annual rental, others through longer
term leases but most were by means of company purchase with a number being
bought by John Carter in a private capacity and re-let to the brewery
company.
The
houses controlled by the brewery were located in Knottingley, Pontefract
and neighbouring villages in the early years but the advent of the railway
system provided scope for geographical expansion and when the firm was
sold by George William Carter in 1892, the brewery’s properties covered
a radius of more than thirty miles from Knottingley. The full history of
the company’s tied houses is recorded elsewhere and only those
properties situated in Knottingley and Ferrybridge are relevant to this
study. (1) Of such properties the earliest recorded is the Anchor Inn,
Aire Street, which was purchased by John Carter in a personal capacity at
an unknown date, probably following his coming of age in 1823 and
certainly before 1837. (2) The Rising Sun and eight cottages were
purchased in 1827. (3)
An
indication of the ongoing prosperity of the brewery company even at that
early period in its history, may be obtained from the fact that many of
the pubs purchased were integral parts of larger lots which included
cottages and outbuildings which added considerably to the overall cost of
each public house. Nevertheless, shortly after taking control of the
brewery three public houses were purchased by Carter for the company, the
Ship Inn, (4) the Duke of York, (5) and the Royal Oak. (6) A number of
cottages accompanying these purchases were used to house brewery workers
whilst the majority of such units were rented out to the public at large.
As a result of the enforced acquisitions the Carter’s, who in 1836 had
very little property beyond the Mill Close brewery and the adjacent family
residence, Lime Grove, were amongst the leading property owners within the
town half a century later.
The
1850s witnessed the purchase of further Knottingley public houses. The Red
Lion, together with a garden, two cottages, a butchers shop and
accompanying slaughter house, was obtained in 1850. (7) In May 1852, the
Bay Horse was purchased. (8) Thus, by 1857 the company owned five public
houses in Knottingley, plus the one belonging to John Carter which was
leased back to the brewery. (9)
Despite
the fact that the company sought to obtain licensed premises to ensure
retail outlets for their expanding production, it did on occasion close
down a purchased property. Such a fate had befallen the Hen & Chickens
public house, Pontefract, which had been obtained by Gaggs, Carter &
Co. in 1813. (10) Where such closures occurred one may conject that the
premises were too dilapidated to be usefully retained but were acquired in
order to prevent the licence falling into the hands of a potential rival.
The
Greyhound Inn was just such a rival house, presenting competition to those
supplied by Gaggs, Carter & Co, for more than twenty years from the
1830s until, following the death of William Bywater, the premises passed
to his son, John, who retained ownership of the property but allowed the
now renamed John Carter & Co., a lease which thereby gave Carter
effective control of the inn. John Bywater’s widow, Hannah Martha,
married John Carter, becoming his third wife on the 11th April, 1872,
eighteen months before his death, but the inn remained her personal
possession, being rented to the company on an annual basis. (11) The
ownership of the Greyhound may have formed part of the marriage settlement
for H.M. Carter’s name also occurs in connection with the leasehold of
the Black Poney (sic), Pontefract, in 1874. (12)
The
name of George Sefton of Knottingley is recorded as the owner of an
unnamed public house within the town in 1857. (13) Sefton appears to have
relied upon Gaggs, Carter & Co., for his liquor supply for the company
is on record as supplying beer to Sefton’s house, known as the Mariner’s
Arms Inn, in 1861. (14) A reduction in the rent paid by the brewery in
1868, may be an indication of declining trade, and a valuation fee made in
respect of the premises the previous year may have been made in connection
with the decline. (15) Little is known of the inn’s subsequent history,
however, and the name of the inn disappears from the company records
shortly afterwards. It therefore seems probable that the inn closed about
that time.
The
Limestone Inn also had a somewhat chequered history from the 1860s. Again,
Carter’s appear to have obtained an agreement to victual the inn for
company records reveal that by 1863 rent was being paid to William
Jackson,a friend of John Carter and owner of the inn. (16) Following
Jackson’s death the premises were purchased by a local farmer, George
Hall, (17) who mortgaged the deeds of the inn as security for a loan of
£200 from John Carter in 1867. (18) Two deeds of October 1867, confirm
Hall as the owner and refer to the property as being"…now
or late in the tenure of John Carter & Co." (19)
The
name of the inn was changed by the new owner, an entry in the company
records referring to the "Limestone or Lamb Inn". (20) The
duality of name is also evident from a reference dated January 1871, which
records that Hall had refunded the sum of five guineas to the brewery,
being half the rent, through loss of the licence of the Limestone Inn.
(21)
Loss
of the licence resulted in the short-term closure of the inn and although
the premises were purchased by Carter for £305 in September 1873,
doubtless in anticipation of the licence being restored. The Lamb Inn was
the last public house to be purchased by John Carter before his death the
following month, the purchase being made in his name but undertaken on
behalf of the company. (22) The premises eventually re-opened but were not
granted the status of a full licence for more than three decades until the
licence was transferred from the Anchor Inn, Aire Street, when the latter
closed in 1908. (23)
The
Jolly Sailor was leased to the brewery company in 1841 for an initial
period of seven years. (24) The lease was obtained from William Dey who
had acquired the title to the inn from Mary Spence, widow of the original
owner. The lease was renewed on the inn, together with its orchard, garden
and adjacent garth, for a period of ten years, in October 1847. (25) At
that date Dey deposited the deeds with John Carter as security for a loan
of £175 and in August 1851, a further loan of £135 was obtained by
William and Michael Dey from Carter, using the deeds to the inn as
security. The loans were repaid by 1857 but Dey was clearly under an
obligation to Carter for a formal accommodation concerning the lease of
the inn for a further seven years was made in January 1858. (26) Later
records indicate the reversion of the lease to an annual rental, an
uncommon course in the context of the licensed trade. (27)
The
concession obtained by John Carter through the indebtedness of William Dey
is a typical example of how brewers in general obtained entry into
licensed premises through rental and leasehold agreements, and indeed,
often took possession of such premises due to default in the repayment of
loans for which deeds had been surrendered as security, for the increase
in trade competition had intensified the need to find new retail outlets
from the third quarter of the nineteenth century. Nor did publicans
necessarily regret the need for an accommodation for the brewer and the
magistrate moved in the same social circles and in matters such as licence
renewal, drunkenness and disorderly conduct on licensed premises and
sundry aspects of law concerning the trade, the brewer was a useful ally
for a publican to have.
In
1858, the brewery company rented the Buck Inn, Aire Street, from Aaron
Hartley of Hunslet, at an annual rent of £35. A leasehold arrangement was
entered into in August 1873, when the inn was taken, together with a group
of nearby cottages for the sum of £50 per year. (28) The inn and
additional properties were ultimately purchased by George William Carter,
who is the recorded owner in 1881. (29)
The
Anvil Inn also provided a retail outlet for the brewery by 1869 and on the
16th May 1874, was purchased together with the nearby Bridge House and a
stable, "Formerly a blacksmith’s shop", from John Bentley, for
the sum of £1,000. (30)
As
the most imposing licensed premises in Knottingley, the Railway Hotel
attracted the interest of John Carter who rented the property in 1861.
(31) At that time the inn traded under its original name of the Royal
Albert Hotel. The owner, Christopher Sturdy, was declared bankrupt and
John Carter, as one of his principal creditors, filed a claim against him.
(32) As a result, Carter obtained possession of the hotel site and its
surrounding land which included a malthouse lying to the west of the inn
site. (33) The deed of settlement is somewhat ambiguous in its terminology
but it would appear that whatever rights of possession were applicable to
Carter they did not confer outright ownership of the premises which are
stated to be occupied by William Earnshaw. From this statement and the
fact that the premises were thenceforth known locally as Earnshaw’s
Hotel, it would appear that Earnshaw was the owner of the inn. Whatever
the legal technicalities arising from the settlement of Sturdy’s affairs
it is apparent that Carter was not the owner of the property for in
December 1871, he made a deposit of £40, representing 10% of the agreed
purchase price of £1,300. (34) The balance was paid on the 5th February
1872 when the brewery became the outright owner of the premises. (35) The
hotel is today the only one remaining of the three which formerly occupied
sites close to the Railway Station and has in fact outlasted the original
station which it was designed to serve for the station site is now merely
a designate stopping place on the Wakefield – Goole line. The Railway
Hotel also has the distinction of having housed more publicans than any
other licensed premises within the town.
Following
the death of John Carter on the 6th October 1873, the administration of
the brewery devolved on his only son, George William Carter. A graduate of
Calus College, Cambridge, and a barrister of Grey’s Inn, Carter had only
become a formal partner in the brewery firm in March 1872. (36) As the
company head, George Carter continued the ‘tied house’ policy begun by
his father some forty years earlier. Whereas John Carter had launched his
expansionist plans in generally favourable circumstances, his successor
was less fortunate. Not only had social and technical change resulted in
increased competition within the trade but the advocates of temperance had
made substantial inroads into the social conscience of society. The
legislative measures affecting licence control introduced by the Liberal
Government in 1869 and 1872 were influenced by the anti-liquor agitation.
The effect of the legislation was a decline in the number of licensed
premises which created market demand and increased competition between
rival brewery chains as they vied to outbid each other for control of the
existing outlets. The situation was exacerbated due to population growth,
particularly in the industrialised urban areas where long and arduous
working conditions created rising consumption of alcohol by the labouring
classes. Thus, although the property market was stabilised by legislative
constraint, the increased degree of competition, fuelled by increasing
public demand, occasioned a sharp rise in the value of licensed
properties.
Simultaneously,
Knottingley brewery was faced with another unwelcome financial burden in
the form of a revaluation of the local rate. As a result, the public
houses within the town, most by now either owned or controlled by the
company, were hit by a substantial increase.
In
addition, the brewery buildings were re-valued, together with on site malt
kilns, being increased from £142 and £96 respectively, to £361 in
total, an increase of 66%. The proposed levy on the majority of the
company’s public houses was accepted by the company but an appeal
against the proposed revaluation of the five most severely hit was made.
The appeal was unsuccessful however, and the firm was faced with the
decision to increase the rents paid by its undertenants. Consequently,
most of the publicans rents rose by an average of £2 per annum during the
period 1876-84. (38)
Aided
by the combined legal expertise of George Carter and his uncle William
Edward Carter, head of the Pontefract based firm of solicitors who acted
as the brewery’s legal representative, the company sought to tighten its
control over its property holdings during the seventies and eighties. One
aspect of this policy was the registration by the company of a trademark
following the introduction of the Trade Marks Registration Act in 1875.
The company’s trademark consisted of a talbot dog, derived from the
family coat of arms, above monogrammed initials J C & Co. By the
adoption of this device goods produced by the company were clearly
identified and the public assured of genuine wares of the traditionally
high standard on which the firms reputation was based.
The
Boat Inn with its accompanying outbuildings was auctioned by Bentley &
Son, the Knottingley auctioneers and valuers, in 1875. (39) Rather
surprisingly the property was not acquired by Carter’s at that time.
Perhaps the premises were withdrawn from sale for the records show that in
1877 they were still owned by the executors of the late owner, John
Raddings, from whom the brewery purchased them in November 1888. (40) The
property comprised a brewhouse, malt chamber, wash room, stable and
piggeries, and three houses (formerly four) nearby. (41) Prior to the
acquisition by Carter’s, the publican, John Hargrave, had brewed beer
for sale exclusively on the premises and was therefore the last publican
victualler’s who were once so common throughout the town. (42)
In
the spring of 1878 the brewery company were presented with the opportunity
to rent the Bee Hive Inn, when the publican owner, Thomas Nichols, died.
(43) The property was rented from Mrs Mary Ann Nichols who remained as
publican until on the 25th November 1879, she sold the inn to George
Carter, together with its stable and surrounding garden, and retired to
Stainforth, Doncaster. (44) The purchase was made in a private capacity
and the property re-let to the brewery company at an annual rental of
£40. (45)
Not
all houses to which the brewery supplied beer were under the control of
the company. An entry in the firm’s accounts dated 12th May 1880 shows,"Beaumont,
Lime Keel, Knottingley, £2 for getting ale of us – 1 year to 2nd May,
£90 worth as per agreement." (46)
James
Beaumont, publican of the Lamb Inn, 1876-79, (47) appears to have acted as
an agent for the brewery for on the 21st April 1882, a deposit of £47 was
made in respect of the purchase of the Lime Keel, with an additional £10
being paid to Beaumont,"…for
buying the [inn] for us." (48)
The
balance of £423 was paid to a London based solicitor on behalf of the
estate of the late owner, Hannah Barker. (49) The beerhouse had been sold
by auction so it would appear that Beaumont, the sitting tenant, had bid
on behalf of the brewery. (49) The role of Beaumont is somewhat curious.
Had the inn been purchased privately his position as the publican might
have been influential in its disposal by the vendor but in an auction,
open to public bidders, such a possibility would be negated. It must
therefore be surmised that the brewery company, perhaps wishing to keep a
low profile in order to minimise expenditure by seeking to appear
indifferent to the sale and thereby lower the financial expectations of
the vendor, appointed Beaumont to act as an unofficial agent at the sale.
The ploy was one adopted in connection with several other out of town
acquisitions about that time. (50) As in such previous cases, considerable
delay ensued before the company was able to take formal possession of the
property. The balance of £423 was paid in June 1882, (51) but it was not
until December that year that the sale was finalised. (52) In passing, it
is worth noting the development of Racca Green was part of the ongoing
change within the town about that time. The proposed scheme included the
construction of a new road and footpaths across the Green to replace the
age-old unmade path which had served the site since time immemorial. The
new road was to follow a line along Cow Lane and connect with a second
road running along the length of Back Lane (the Croft). (53) It is quite
probable that Carter’s acquisition of the Lime Keel was to some extent
at least, prompted by the awareness of the benefit the proposed civic
development would confer on the trade of the inn for the projected road is
mentioned in several deeds concerning the property at Racca Green
purchased by Carter at that time.
The
Wagon & Horses was acquired in a rather random way. In April 1875, the
publican John Shay, mortgaged the inn and nine adjacent cottages, as
security for a loan of £200 made by George William Carter. (54) Shay’s
financial problems appear to have proved to be intractable for by November
the following year William Barker gave up his tenancy of the Bee Hive and
was installed as the inn-keeper, renting a stable and chamber from Carter
which formed part of the range of buildings known as King’s Houses. (55)
From this it would appear that the mortgaged properties belonged to Carter
at this time, a fact confirmed by an entry in the records of the brewery
company, dated 25th May, 1880, noting the repayment of Shay’s loan and
stating"This
property, near the Wagon & Horses Inn has been purchased from Shay by
George Wm. Carter Esq., as his private property and not for the
brewery." (56)
It
would appear that Shay’s loan had been settled by means of Carter’s
purchase and whilst the entry makes no specific reference to the inn, its
purchase is confirmed by a deed of sale of the same date. (57) The change
in the tenancy is itself an indication of changed ownership for the
installation of a different publican was usual following the acquisition
of licensed premises. The practise was increasingly followed by the 1880s
when the growing influence of the temperance movement caused brewers to
exercise greater vigilance in respect of the selection of sub-tenants. A
respectable publican who curbed drunkenness and co-operated with the
police in the maintenance of public order was a most desirable tenant.
1880
was also the year when the brewery acquired the Cherry Tree Inn. A deposit
of £165 was paid to Joseph Brown in respect of the purchase of the inn,
dwelling house, with barbers shop and stables on the 18th June 1880. (58)
The balance of £1,440 was paid on the 4th August when the sale was
completed. (59)
The
Commercial Hotel, Hill Top, which despite its imposing title was generally
described as a beerhouse, even in the company records, was added to the
list of company houses through purchase at auction on the 1st July 1880.
(60) Although the sale included lad to the east side of the inn, and the
premises were situated in a prime location to attract the passing trade,
they lacked the spaciousness of the nearby Railway Hotel which stood
almost opposite. Nevertheless, the Commercial may have drawn an element of
the trade from its grander neighbour and this may be the reason why the
brewery decided to buy the premises. That the acquisition was surplus to
the company’s requirement is obvious for within a short space of time
following its purchase, the Commercial was leased to a rival brewery
company, Mitchell Bros., of Castleford, at a rent of £20 per year. (61)
That Carter’s could allow a rival chain to sell its beer in close
proximity to their most prestigious house speaks volumes for the
confidence of the Knottingley firm in the superiority of its brews and
underlines the recent assertion concerning the poor quality of Mitchells
beer. (62) The rental by Mitchells appears to have resulted in the sale of
the property by Carters for by 1884, Mitchell Bros. Are shown as the
owners of a public house and shop at Hill Top, under the tenancy of George
Middleton. (63)
On
the 20th January 1887, the Aire Street Hotel was bought. The property
consisted of a dwelling house and shop, which had formerly served as a
dram shop but was stated at the time of purchase to be a single building
used as a wine and spirit vault and barber’s shop. (64) The vendors were
the Lomas family who at some earlier date must have acquired the premises
from the erstwhile owner, George Greenhow. William Holmes. landlord of the
Hotel, is first recorded as a wine and spirit merchant in 1871 which may
provide an approximate date for the transition of the dram shop into a
wine and spirit vault and also perhaps, an indication of the change of
owner. (65) Although the premises retained the name of the Aire Street
Hotel almost until the eve of the Second World War, there is evidence that
following his purchase of the property, George Carter assigned a part of
the premises for use as the Conservative Club, a function it continued to
serve until the club moved to its present Hill Top site about 1922. (66)
A
Ferrybridge inn owned by Carter’s from January 1885 was the Willow Tree.
Situated in the High Street, the premises had an interesting history,
being part of a series of buildings which had once formed part of the town’s
prison and latterly converted into dwelling houses. (67) The inn premises
also had another claim to fame, one of the recent residents being Joshua
Arnall, co-inventor of the first successful glass bottle-making machine.
(68)
Perhaps
the Carter house of which least is known is the Three Horse Shoes. The inn
was situated at Racca Green and appears to have been re-established during
the ‘beer boom’ of the 1830s, although operating as a fully licensed
premises. (69) The inn was bought by Carter’s sometime before 1866 for a
single reference within the company books relates to the premium paid on
the property insurance and dated 29th September 1866. (70) Thereafter, the
name disappears from public view and it may only be assumed that the
premises were closed down before the end of the decade.
However
essential tied public houses may have been for the continued prosperity of
the brewery companies, tied houses meant tied drinkers who had to endure
the conditions imposed upon them by the controlling brewery. Despite
changes and alterations to make licensed premises more comfortable and
appealing in the closing decades of the nineteenth century many local
public houses continued to present an ‘old fashioned’ image to the
public and consequently attracted only modest trade. Even when Carters’
Knottingley Brewery was taken over by Bentleys’ Yorkshire Breweries in
1935, any attempt to improve the overall standard of the properties
acquired was stifled by the adverse economic conditions of the decade and
the advent of the Second World War. The immediate post-war period was one
of austerity and material shortages so that even by the mid 1960s when
Whitbread, the giant London based brewery company took control of the
former Carter holdings, the appearance and ambience of the remaining
public houses in Knottingley was little changed from almost a century
earlier. Consequently, a process of economic rationalisation commenced
which resulted in the closure and demolition of some premises and the
modernisation of those adjudged to have a viable future.
Terry Spencer, 1998
<PREV
| NEXT>
|