UBIQUITOUS AMBASSADORS
KNOTTINGLEY SILVER BAND
by TERRY SPENCER B.A. (Hons), Ph D.
CHAPTER TWO
CONTENTS |
PAGE ONE | PAGE TWO |
PAGE THREE |
PAGE FOUR |
THE EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY: 1901 - 1920
PAGE TWO
Examination of extant
documentation reveals that by the turn of the twentieth century the Band
possessed a well ordered administrative structure, comprising six officers and
a general committee of seven members, all being playing members and all
nominated by the rank and file members of the Band.
In 1903 the ‘figurehead’
President of the Band was John Harker, a director of Messrs. Stainsby & Lyon,
who in April that year had become Chairman of Knottingley Urban District
Council. (32) The officers of the Band that year were:
Chairman: W Bailey Jnr
Vice Chairman: G. Johnson
Secretary: H. Hannar
Assistant Secretary: S. Marshall Jnr.
Treasurer: R. Marshall
The Committee men were; B.
Braim, Alf Richardson, E. Baxter, J. Downing, J. Draper, G, Rowbottom and A.
Richardson.
The Bandmaster was Samuel
Marshall, designated ‘Junior’ to distinguish him from his same name father who
was also unofficially involved with the affairs of the Band. In addition to
the above personnel were two bandsmen nominated as auditors, J. Dey and R.
Trueman. (33)
The earliest existing code of
rules, dated 30th May 1904, confirms the title of the ensemble as ‘Knottingley
Prize Band’ although by the time of the appearance of a public notice in the
local press a few weeks later the title had been adapted to include the
adjective ‘Silver’, (34) and the Band was to retain this tile for
three-quarters of a century until it was amended in 1979. (35) Comparison of a
further code of rules featured inside the front cover of the Band Minute Book
of 1978 reveals that with the exception of minor amendments to two or three
clauses, the basic rules are the same as those of 1904. As the 1978
codification states that the rules are “adapted from the original [of] 1880”
it is clear that for most of the preceding century an almost unchanged codex
had provided the basis of the administration of the Band. Perhaps even more
surprising given the rampant inflation in the decades after 1945, is the fact
that the membership entrance fee of 2s 6d with contributions of 2d per week,
remained unchanged until 1982 when a somewhat belated acceptance of
decimalisation resulted in its amendment to 50p. (36)
The third clause in the 1904
code of rules decrees that “any person wishing to join this Band to be
brought before the whole Band”, the words “whole band” being a pencilled
insertion replacing the word “committee”. The amendment reveals a incipient
‘power struggle’ at that period, an indication reinforced by a resolution
passed the following month that;
“Band business [be] by the
whole Band rather than the Committee”,
which was, however, rejected by
8 votes to 5. (37) Nevertheless, the closeness of the vote and the framing of
the resolution designed to counter one of only a month earlier which stated
that,
“The Committee makes all the
Rules to the satisfaction of the Band”
would seem to indicate a rank
and file assertion of primitive democracy. (38) Given this seemingly apparent
struggle for administrative supremacy it is surprising that the rules have
remained largely intact since 1880.
A clause stipulating common
ownership of “instruments, music, music stands, uniforms and all property”
is particularly interesting in the light of a subsequent application to join
the Band. A Committee meeting in June 1904, agreed, subject to the approval of
the whole Band that;
“D. Bailey be a member
providing he brings his own instrument to the practice.” (39)
The Committee was empowered to
expel members for misconduct, arrears or non-attendance and such members, or
others leaving the Band voluntarily, were required “to return all property
in a condition satisfactory to the Committee and if damaged, made good.”
(40)
Although it was decreed that “All
rules be strictly enforced” there was a wide disparity between theory and
practice on a number of points. Arrears of contributions has perhaps been the
most persistently unobserved rule throughout the Band’s entire existence, yet
instances of expulsion are singularly absent from the record, perhaps because
the musical contribution of members exceeded the value of a fiscal nature
making a loss through expulsion more costly than financial loss? A regular
practice adopted by the Committee at various periods has been to post
reminders of arrears of contributions in the bandroom, the earliest recorded
example being in June 1904, which also incorporated the notice that
non-attendance of 8 out of 12 band practices in any month would result in a
fine of 3d for each offence. (41)
A degree of leniency in respect
of arrears was doubtless influenced by the economic hardship and unemployment
which was so prevalent in working class society during the first four decades
of the twentieth century. Thus we find recorded that one member was;
“…to be excused his subs but
if he does not attend practices, to pay subs for weeks he is absent”, (42)
and again, “contributions by our of work members to be 1d but if a member
works 4 days in a week, to be 2d.” (43)
The withdrawal of members
whether on a temporary or permanent basis frequently caused much expenditure
in time and labour on the part of the Secretary who after writing several
letters to ascertain the future intentions of absentee members, or in an
effort to secure the return of Band property, often had to make one or more
visits to members homes to confront them personally. (44)
Incidence of misconduct was
fortunately rare with instances of bad behaviour often arising in the heat of
the moment and usually concluded by the tendering and acceptance of an
apology. Such was the case in May 1904, when a member was given a specific
date by which an explanation of recent conduct had to be made to the full
membership. The ultimatum being observed the recalcitrant member’s apology was
unanimously accepted. (45)
To obviate petty disputes, the
bandmaster was decreed the arbiter of all situations occurring whether in
engagements, practices or on parade (46) and in recognition of this
responsibility was paid an extra half share of all dividends accruing from
financial surpluses paid to band members following clearance of all routine
expenditure. (47)
The Committee was appointed on
an annual basis with resignations being subject to immediate replacement. Any
unspecified rules were to be determined by the Committee and no business
concerning the Band was to be undertaken without the sanction of the Committee
although in the event of the offer of an engagement arising at short notice
the Secretary and Bandmaster were empowered to deal with the matter
themselves. (48)
The mainstay of the Band was
the rule that it be “not broken up as long as six members are opposed to
its dissolution.” (49)
The first identified bandroom
was the upper floor of a limestone-built property located down a yard on the
south side of Aire Street. The property was a warehouse owned by Willie Wray,
a local greengrocer and fishmonger. Wray kept goods in the basement area so
the regular presence of the Band members and the bandroom caretaker in the
upper room ensured an additional degree of security for the goods. (50) The
first known caretaker was R. Marshall. Marshall was the sole keyholder and it
was stipulated that no one was to have access to the bandroom without his
approval. (51)
Early documentation provides
fleeting glimpses of routine expenditure which although only of a minor nature
appears to have strained the finances of the Band. R. Marshall received 10
shillings per year for undertaking the duties of the caretaker of the bandroom
and he and J. Wild received two shillings for the preparatory measure of
placing music in the bandbooks. A further item of expenditure was the 5
shillings per year paid to the Secretary who in 1905 was given the additional
responsibility of drawing up and presenting the annual accounts. (52) A more
substantial expense was the cost of heating the bandroom during the winter
season, with the Secretary being sanctioned to order ½ ton of coke and ¼ ton
of coal for the purpose. (53) To supplement income collecting boxes were
placed in local public houses but it is clear that the Band’s finances were
precarious in the early years of the twentieth century as revealed by a
resolution of February 1905 that the,
“Secretary and Caretaker
[are] to work gratis….” (54)
Furthermore, such was the need
for new instruments that the Annual General Meeting of 1905 decreed that
members subscriptions of 2d per week be supplemented by a compulsory levy of
1d to be earmarked as the ‘cornet fund’. (55) Further evidence of the
financial plight of the Band is manifest in payment to Benjamin Braim, a local
businessman and Band member who chaired the 1905 A.G.M., of £3 plus interest
as part payment for an outstanding debt. (56) It is also noticeable that in an
effort to generate extra income at this time the Committee resolved to sub-let
the bandroom to the local String Band for practices each Wednesday night at a
charge of 1s 3d and in the light of the recent addition of ‘Silver’ to the
title of the Band it is of passing interest to note that the resolution to
sub-let the premises states that “the Brass Band [is] to supply coal for
their use.” (57)
Mindful of the financial
difficulties of the Band early last century, the decision to engage a guest
conductor is more than a little surprising. One can only assume that the
acquisition of ‘Prize’ status fostered the ambition of the Band. To what
extent the expansion of membership arose from the Band’s growing reputation or
was a manifestation of new found ambition is problematical but records for
1905 show an increase of five new members and only one withdrawal. (58)
Perhaps the engagement of a
professional conductor was regarded as a necessary prerequisite for future
competitive success and to this end a motion;
“That we engage J.W. Stamp
to come on Sunday 7th May 1905”,
was unanimously agreed. (59)
Stamp was the regular conductor of the Castleford Subscription Band with whom
he had undertaken contest appearances and continental tours acquiring a wide
experience and high reputation in the process. Indeed, Stamp was no stranger
to Knottingley Band for as early as July 1903 a ‘sacred’ concert during which
he had conducted the band was heralded as a “great success” on which
occasion, “a fine programme was gone through and its execution reflected
credit on the band and its conductor.” (60)
The circumstances which had
prompted his initial engagement are not recorded but it is not too fanciful,
perhaps, to imagine that as a result of that concert the desire arose to renew
acquaintance with Stamp and that in consequence the invitation to visit in May
1905 was to provide an opportunity for him to assess the contesting potential
of the Band and the terms of engagement. The occasion appears to have proved
satisfactory to all parties for Stamp was engaged to conduct the Band later
that month and also on four other occasions between June and September that
year. (61)
Stamp may have detected areas
of weakness in the Band’s performance for shortly after his engagement as
guest conductor it is recorded that,
“Cornet and soprano players
be engaged for the South Kirkby contest, 8th July 1905.”
The decision was in accordance
with standard procedure at that period for widely observed regulations
permitted the appearance of ‘guest players’ on occasion, providing such
players were registered with only one band. Thus, although from 1902 players
taking part in the National Championship were required to fulfil a minimum
membership qualification of three months, when the Silver Band appeared at the
Crystal Palace in 1911, its ranks included a professional player from Sowerby
Bridge and one ‘borrowed’ from the Castleford Subscription Band. On other
occasions players from Brotherton Band are known to have made ‘guest’
appearances with the Prize Band.
Terry Spencer 2006
<PAGE
ONE | PAGE THREE>
|